Explained: ‘Barriers’ to upper pay range cause frustration for teachers

Staff report ‘shifting’ goalposts as union warns of ‘significant contribution to the exodus’ of teachers

By ​
2 min read


‘Barriers’ to upper pay range cause frustration for teachers is examined in this 2026 education briefing, which sets out the central development, the practical context for schools and the questions leaders may need to consider.

What happened?

“Unfair barriers” stop teachers advancing to the upper pay range, a report has warned, as school staff reported goalposts “shifting all the time”. In England, pay scales for classroom teachers comprise nine points: a six-point main pay range (M1 to M6), and a three-point upper pay range (U1 to U3), also known as the upper pay scale.

Key details from the report

  • Outside London, MPR advisory salaries range from £32,916 to £45,352, while UPR salaries range from £47,472 to £51,048.
  • Any teacher can apply to move to the upper pay range.
  • But data collected for the National Education Union found teachers faced obstacles leading to a bottleneck, as well as slow progression once they reached the UPR.
  • An Incomes Data Research survey gathered responses on the UPR from 2,300 union members, across primary and secondary.

Why this matters for schools

The issue is relevant to school leaders because policy announcements, funding decisions and regulatory changes rarely operate in isolation. Their effects can reach staffing, budgets, curriculum planning, pupil support and communication with families. Leaders should distinguish confirmed requirements from proposals, check the implementation timetable and identify which decisions need action now.

For classroom and SEND teams, the practical question is how the development affects access, inclusion and day-to-day provision. Schools may wish to review existing plans, clarify responsibilities and make sure staff receive information in a form they can use. Where national details remain incomplete, recording assumptions and revisiting them as guidance changes can reduce avoidable confusion.

Questions for leaders and governing boards

  • What has been formally confirmed, and what remains under consultation or development?
  • Which pupils, staff or services are most likely to be affected?
  • Are there financial, workforce, safeguarding or SEND implications that require early planning?
  • What evidence or updated guidance should be monitored next?
  • How will the school communicate any resulting change clearly to staff and families?

Keep exploring

Last updated 07 August 2026